翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Logunovium ・ Logunovium nigricostum ・ Logunovium scortillum ・ Logville, Kentucky ・ Logy Bay Road ・ Logy Bay-Middle Cove-Outer Cove ・ Logănești ・ Log–log plot ・ Loh ・ Loh Ah Chee ・ Loh Boon Siew ・ Loh Gwo Burne ・ Loh Kooi Choon v Malaysia ・ Loh Sea Keong ・ Loh tarang ・ Loh Wai Kong v Malaysia ・ Loha ・ Loha (1987 film) ・ Loha (1997 film) ・ Loha (Vidhan Sabha constituency) ・ Loha Mandi ・ Loha Singh ・ Loha taluka ・ Loha, Nanded ・ Lohachara Island ・ Lohafary ・ Lohafex ・ Lohagad ・ Lohagara Upazila ・ Lohagara Upazila, Chittagong Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Loh Wai Kong v Malaysia ： ウィキペディア英語版 Loh Wai Kong v Malaysia ''Loh Wai Kong v. Government of Malaysia'' (1979) 2 MLJ 33 was a case heard in the Federal Court of Malaysia. Loh Wai Kong sought a ruling from the courts that Malaysian citizens were entitled to travel overseas as a fundamental right under Article 5 of the Constitution. The Federal Court ruled that no such right existed. ==Background== Loh was a permanent resident of Australia. He returned to Malaysia in April 1975, and was charged with a criminal offense in the High Court at Ipoh on 2 August 1976. Loh obtained bail on condition that he surrender his passport. On 2 March 1977, his passport expired, and Loh had it returned. He later applied for a new passport, citing the need to return to Australia by 1978, or his resident visa there would expire. The authorities rejected the application, saying that he was involved in a criminal case and that the issuance of a passport was at the discretion of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (King). Loh then filed suit in the High Court at Penang, asking the court to compel the government to issue him a passport, on the grounds that the right to travel abroad is a fundamental liberty protected by the Constitution. The High Court rejected Loh's application, but made a number of statements in its ruling which the government disagreed with. In particular, the trial judge held that the phrase "personal liberty" in Article 5 of the Constitution included the right to leave the country, and that the refusal to issue a passport constituted an infringement of the right to personal liberty. The government thus appealed to the Federal Court for clarification.〔 In the Federal Court, Loh's lawyer said that although Loh did not have an absolute right to a passport, he did have a qualified right on condition of good character. The government responded that no such right, absolute or qualified, existed.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Loh Wai Kong v Malaysia」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.